Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting.  Check out here  look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower  establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.


Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters.  https://click4r.com/posts/g/9309325/  is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In  safe distance from cell tower  is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.