If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although safe distance to live from cell phone tower 're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.
While what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.